Rebooting democracy: Setting the debate #piug12

Public-i user group

On Monday the 19th of March, we’ll be sitting down for the Public-i user group, which will feature an afternoon discussion, themed ‘Rebooting Democracy’. So it seemed like a good idea to explain what we’re thinking – and to kick off the debate. You can get involved on the day by watching and chatting here on the day and tweeting with the hashtag #piug12…

Rebooting democracy

If you wanted to make sure that the public was able to participate in democracy would you really run council meetings in the way that we do right now? Process and purpose have been layered and changed over years and what we have ended up with looks and feels alien to anyone not involved on a day-to-day basis. Forget about the technology, the language alone tells us the public is not welcome. There are good reasons why local democracy operates the way it does and it is pretty difficult to imagine radical change of processes which are so culturally embedded. I’m not saying it’s impossible but it’s going to be hard.

I think that much of the change will be and has been incremental. When we started trying to persuade people to webcast their meetings we had a fairly non-plussed response (though that may have been down to the idea that you could view video over a 56k modem!) but, 10 years later, streaming meetings is now an established practice.

We probably don’t want to wait that long for the next major change in the way in which meetings are run.

The democratic process is so rooted in tradition, culture and power that we very rarely take it apart and examine it. There is an additional challenge, too: the unspoken fear that we may be using the arcanity of the process to cover up the fact that the underlying debate is not actually good enough to show people.

With the arrival of the elected Police and Crime Commissioners, and a cohort of newly elected Mayors turning up soon, we are going to be seeing changes in local democracy that might offer us the chance to look at the process and redefine how we want it to work. This should mean looking at the world as it is today and creating a process which works for people as they live their lives right now. And yes – this will probably involve better use of technology.

We’re going to try and contribute to this debate: we are already talking to police authorities about what the new PCC posts might mean and we’re going to use the user group to debate this a bit more. It’s a good place to talk abou this because it brings together people – either in person or online – who care a great deal about the democratic process and we think they are an excellent starting point if we are going to really take the council meeting apart and put it back together. We’ll let you know how we get on but feel free to contribute here.

Tags:

Re-booting Democracy: the Public-i user group – 19th of March, 2012

Nick Booth at Public-i User Group

We’ll be holding the next Public-i user group on Monday the 19th of March with the rather exciting theme ‘rebooting democracy’. Below I’ve set out a little bit about what we mean by that – and the agenda.

But first, the essentials…

  • The user group starts at 10.30am on the 19th of March at the Hallam Conference Centre, 44 Hallam Street, London, W1W 6JJ.
  • If you’d like to come along then please contact Jane Purcell – her email address is jane.purcell@public-i.info and telephone +44(0)1273 821282.
  • To watch and join the debate online, visit our interactive player on the day. We’ll be webcasting and live blogging – so you can asks questions and put your point across to those in the room.

Rebooting democracy

We’re looking at a remarkable time for local democracy – with so many changes in the offing it’s hard to mention them all.

Close to home we’re seeing the creation of city mayors and directly elected Police and Crime Commissioners for England and Wales – as well as the independence debate and proposals for a single police force in Scotland. At the same time, of course, there’s a techonological revolution taking place that offers the potential to reshape the relationship authorities and their representatives can have with the public everywhere.

With so much (digital) disruption and devolution in the offing, we thought it would be a good time to debate how we might fundamentally re-shape democracy for the 21st century. We hope to have a wide-open debate about what we could dream of doing to make political decision making better and more responsive in the future. Such an exciting time, we think, calls for an exciting – and daring – debate!

Catherine at a Public-i User Group

The agenda

As ever, there’ll be the usual highlights to the user group, including Dr Lewis’s surgery, more news about our products and the development roadmap update, before we get on with the debate in the afternoon…

10.30am Welcome and introductions

11am Development roadmap:

  • Update on Connect
  • Opportunity to add to the roadmap

12pm Dr Lewis’s Surgery – Best practice exchange:

  • Get technical questions answered
  • Find out about or make requests for product developments

1pm Lunch

2pm Panel discussion – Reboot Democracy – Some ideas to get started:

  • Do we need formal meetings?
  • How do we create more direct representation?
  • What skills are we going to need?

4pm AOB, drinks and twiglets

See you there!

Tags:

CityCamp Brighton: a quick roundup of Friday’s talks

I only went to the first day (the Friday) of Brighton’s second CityCamp, but from all I’ve heard the weekend was a big success.

I expect we’ll get a lot more from others who were there over the weekend, but I thought I’d just sum up a little of what happened on Friday before that. As we heard at the time, the event will live on both in the ideas that have won funding and with the many other projects that people will pursue, so hopefully the inspiring and thought-provoking things that speakers said then will still be relevant. Obviously, this is just quick run down. For chapter and verse check out the webcast (with all the slides) here.

Social deprivation is a massive, massive challenge…

Alistair Hill of NHS Sussex presents

We heard from Alistair Hill of NHS Sussex that while Brighton and Hove is in the privileged South East of England, its levels of social deprivation are relatively high (see above). Some more insights:-

  • Between 1.3 and 2.5 million life years are lost in England every year through health inequalities.
  • The Marmot Review said that health inequalities economic costs of up to £70bn. But impact on quality of life and wellbeing is even greater.
  • Between Portslade and Whitehawk there is a seven-year female and 10-year male life expectancy gap.

We need to create jobs… and we should be good at it!

Colin Monk, who is the pro-vice chancellor at Brighton University for business and marketing spoke with passion and authority about how our city has to recognise how its strengths can create new jobs at a time when they are desperately needed.

  • Brighton and Hove needs to create 6,000 jobs over the next three years to stay at the same employment rate.
  • Brighton’s greatest resource is that it ‘embodies the knowledge-enterprise culture probably better than any other single location in the world else’.
  • Two different studies both suggest small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) are responsible for the bulk of job growth – and Brighton has an unusually high concentration of these.

He pointed out that Brighton has the potential to become a ‘super city’ – which he explained to me afterwards in this video…

 

Brighton is a remarkable place and can be home to remarkable ideas

Will McInnes of Nixon McInnes talked about how social and technological changes and challenges have resulted in remarkable innovation. He mentioned a few ideas that he thought might be illustrative and helpful to CityCamp Brighton…

  • Bank Transfer Day in America – a movement to encourage people in the US to move their money from commercial banks to credit unions.
  • The recent flashmob to support women breastfeeding in public in Brighton.
  • Buddy, a text message diary about how you’re feeling to help people with their mental health.

He explains some other ideas in this short video interview I did on Friday:-

 

This is a big year for Brighton and the UK

John Barradell, who is the chief executive of Brighton and Hove City Council, rounded up the day by setting out a very big challenge for the city. He explains here…

Tags:

Brighton’s first social media surgery

Brighton's first social media surgery

Last night I attended the first ever Brighton Social Media Surgery – a rather special if small event that marks an important landmark for a number of reasons.

  • For one, it’s the start of an important phase of the We Live Here project which is aiming to usher in a new relationship between the public, voluntary and community sectors in Brighton and Hove.
  • It’s also one of the first surgeries to have taken place since the Social Media Surgeries were honoured with a Prime Minister’s Big Society Award.
  • And, from a personal perspective, it feels like it rubber-stamps by big-money transfer to Public-i from Podnosh – the firm that through the enormous largesse, industry and general brilliance of its creator, Nick Booth, has made the surgeries the success they are.

OK, so I was slightly lying about ‘big money’ bit, but the rest is absolutely true – and being involved in social media surgeries (which I first blundered into in Fazeley Studios in Birmingham – as it happens without a computer and could only lend a hand moving the desks) has been a source of enormous enjoyment and reward for me. So getting the chance to become involved as a surgeon in my new home town is, frankly, fabulous.

Enough of the gushing… Now for the surgery…

The We Live Here project will be holding surgeries in the three pilot communities it’s running in. Two of these, Hangleton and Knoll and Brunswick and Regency, are geographical; the third, the Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) communities in Brighton is obviously rather harder to define.

For that reason, Susie Latta – the surgery organiser, held the first one in the Black and Minority Ethnic Community Partnership building, which is at 10A Fleet Street. Here’s a map!

We sat in the foyer of the BMECP and, while I was a little late, Anthony Zacharzewski was able to help out three patients with Twitter (that’s Anthony in the picture above) – with this account for for Forward Facing created. Please give ‘em a follow!

When Anthony went, I took over and helped Bert Williams of Brighton and Hove Black History to learn a little more about how he’d be able to use QR codes as part of his work. Bert holds tours of our city that devle into the remarkable role people of different ethnic backgrounds have played in Brighton’s history. As ever, being a surgeon was as much a learning experince as it was an opportunity to impart my own knowledge: I found out from Bert that – much to my surprise – the Emperor Haile Selassie of Abyssinia (now Ethiopia) had visited Brighton while in exile!

For details of surgeries visit the Social Media Surgery website. The next one in Brighton will be on the 27th of February 2012 and there’ll be one in Hangleton and Knoll on the 29th of February.

SHARE THIS POST: (I’ve cross-posted this piece on my own blog and on the Public-i blog. Please re-post it to your own blog if you want to tell people about the surgeries – and modify for your audience, but please link back to the orginal and attribute the post. Thanks!)

Tags:

Social Media Audits and renewable energy in Cambridgeshire: using the audit to start engagement

Sheryl at the final CRIF event in November 2011

As part of a series of posts about our Social Media Audits, we’ll be providing examples of how we tackled each project and the benefits it helped to establish for our clients. This first example is from the Cambridgeshire Renewable Infrastructure Framework, and it tells the story of how we used the audit to introduce our then client, Cambridgeshire Horizons, to the online community of people talking about renewable energy in the county.

The challenge
Cambridgeshire Horizons was commissioned in 2010 to identify the future energy needs of the county and how this could be supported by renewable energy delivery. The project, known as Cambridgeshire Renewables Infrastructure Framework (CRIF) would set out how the county should increase its renewable-energy capacity. Horizons asked Public-i to engage residents, business and the public sector in a complex and politically sensitive project that would involve discussing divisive issues, including things like wind-turbine development.

The strategy
We set out to provide what we called a ‘digitally led’ engagement strategy. This would start by finding people online who were already interested in renewable energy, before involving these individuals in developing and informing the project and helping to take the message of the CRIF to communities across the county.

Finding online communities
By working closely with our client to understand Cambridgeshire’s geographical, social and political make-up, Public-i devised a taxonomy to pick out social-web conversations about renewable energy and related subjects. We then qualified and codified these results before looking in detail at the results, which included identifying the individuals behind the groups and offering analysis of the conversations. Finally, we developed an overall strategy for engaging with these groups and individuals.

The audit provided value for the client in several different ways:-

  • The community: Public-i provided a detailed breakdown of the people using social media to talk about renewable energy – finding the real individuals behind online groups and personas. We considered the relationships between them, using social network analysis, to identify who were the most well-networked and helpful to the engagement process.
  • The numbers: The audit offered a statistical analysis of the activity for Cambridgeshire Horizons to help determine the best ways to communicate and engage with the online audience. In total, the audit found more than 300 websites and social media identities that were relevant to the project.
    • Catherine Howe estimated the reach that we gained as a direct result of using the Social Media Audit as the basis for the communication and engagement strategy.

      Estimated Potential Reach:-

      • Reachable followers on Twitter: 14,000
      • Members of Facebook groups: 19,300
      • 34 hyperlocal websites – if we estimate reach of 300 people then that’s an audience of 10,200
      • 20 significant individuals who are communicating to many more people
  • Providing insight: The audit found positive and negative conversations – offering an understanding of the strength of feeling for and against renewable energy and shedding light on the views these groups had and how they might affect the engagement.
  • Helping offline engagment: The audit was able to help us establish people who were able to carry the message of the CRIF to offline as well as online networks and communities.
  • Joining the conversation: By carefully coding the results, we could see not just who was talking but could understand more about what they were saying. This enabled the CRIF team to join in existing conversations – and ensure the message was relevant to their audience.

CRIF first event - discussing community energy generation

What happened:-

  • The results from the Social Media Audit became the backbone for the engagement strategy. The CRIF project team invited those who were found online to a series of engagement events – which the client feels were invaluable in helping to build a relationship between the public and the project.
  • Public-i developed a blog and used its Citizenscape platform to collect social media activity from the people that we found to help to continue and bolster the engagement process.
  • More events are planned, with the CRIF expected to be delivered in early 2012.

What the client says
Sheryl French was the project leader for the CRIF, working first for Cambridgeshire Horizons and then Cambridgeshire County Council, when the project transferred to the local authority’s control. She says that the audit has proved an invaluable tool for the CRIF team in discovering who the communities they need to engage with are.

She says: “At the start of our project we knew that engaging with our local community online was important, but we only really knew the most prolific and vocal few in our area.

“The social media audit identified the potential for online dialogue in our area and was an invaluable insight into how local residents use social media and what topics they’re actually discussing, and therefore interested in. We are now able to harness this ‘people power’ to help spread our project messages further.

“It has also been good to meet the online enthusiasts face to face. Without the social media audit we would have been blind to these discussions and these important people.”

Now
Our work on the CRIF itself is now at an end: The CRIF report, the culmination of this stage of the project, has been written and handed to decision makers at Cambridgeshire Local Authorities, the Environment Agency and representatives from the Developer and Registered Social Landlords . That report incorporates a huge effort, from all of the people involved in the CRIF – those who were part of the project team, as well as the many people brought into the process from the three pathways – community, business and public sector.

Improvement East, which part funded the CRIF alongside Housing Growth Funds, has since commissioned Public-i to develop a case study so that the strategy we’ve developed for the CRIF becomes a replicable programme for engagement and consultation work elsewhere. We’re looking forward to that case study becoming available soon – and we’ll keep you up to date on what happens here on the blog.

It’s allowed us to look at everything we’ve done on the CRIF – in terms of the engagement and how the SMA helped that process (often in unexpected ways!). While this post makes some of that clear, we’re still learning and I’d love to hear if other people have any thoughts on this kind of process – would you use it? Could the SMA help in other ways?

Tags:

© 2011 Public-i Group Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Blog powered by Wordpress and a Public-i version of the Magatheme theme.