How bloggers and police countered riot rumours in Wolverhampton

This is a follow-up to a post I wrote about the riots a few days ago – where I tried to highlight some of the good things to come from the use of social media at the time.

One of the examples I cited was Superintendent Mark Payne‘s tweeting to counter the wildly inaccurate rumours about what was happening in Wolverhampton. As commenters on the post pointed out (including Mel Potter of Wolverhampton City Council), the WV11 blog (which, as it happens, we’d highlighted in a report commissioned by Wolverhampton City Council and West Midlands Police as a great example of civic use of social media) had been using its Facebook page to also battle against the misinformation.

I thought I’d try to get something written and published today, because the Home Secretary has been meeting with the social networks (and Blackberry manufacturers RIM) to talk about how their services were used during the disturbances. There have been calls from some politicians and a few police to suspend Twitter and Facebook during similar events in the future, in the belief that this would stop rumours that end up wasting police time from quickly spreading. So I’m hoping this is a timely piece – even if it is a very long one!!!

Monday 8th of August, 2011

Following riots over the weekend in London, there were reports of trouble spreading to other cities across England on Monday including nearby Birmingham. In Wolverhampton, at this time Mark Payne said that nothing was happening – despite many rumours to the contrary. If you look at his Twitter stream from that day, you can see what he did to counter these rumours. He took time to carefully answer questions and clear up some of the confusion, as well as reporting from other officers around the West Midlands.

At the same time, Steph from the WV11 blog told us that she was seeing similar rumours circulating on Facebook. That evening, she and partner James started to update their Facebook page to set people straight:-

Tuesday 9th of August, 2011

On Tuesday morning, Mark tweeted that there was some minor damage to shops in Wolves overnight, but this was nothing in comparison to the problems elsewhere. At middday, he tweeted: “Huge amount of resources available to quell any trouble in Wolverhampton and the West Mids. Hope common sense prevails.”

Later that day, Mark was on the ground when trouble did flare up: “I was in amongst the rioters five minutes before it kicked off,” he told me. “And I was able to use twitter to tell people what was actually happening – and what wasn’t.” Mark said, too, that he knew when and why there would be trouble. “I know a lot of the criminals [in Wolverhampton] and I saw people in amongst that crowd who were criminals. It was clear that was where the disorder was coming from,” he said. “It became really hostile and really volatile, really quickly.”

Because Mark’s updates were coming from a verifiable, official source they proved helpful to other people in Wolverhampton trying to make sense of what was going on. Steph Jennings of the WV11 blog said: “When we set up WV11 we made a decision that we’d only ever report things if we knew were fact, so getting updates from Mark and other police officers was really valuable.”

Steph and James relayed Mark’s updates regularly to their Facebook page and blog – pouring cold water on myths that there had disturbances at the Bentley Bridge shopping centre in Wednesfield (which, by the way, is WV11). The work they did appears to have had an invaluable effect. “After a while, people were coming onto the Facebook page and correcting what other people were saying [when they were rumours]. People were saying things like: ‘I think you should just listen to what the guys running the site are saying.’”

Of course, Mark’s tweets weren’t just being followed by the WV11 blog – but by more traditional news sources, too. At one point, Mark says, the content of an update found its way on to Sky News – perhaps more proof if it was needed of the value and timeliness of the information he was providing.

Wednesday 10th of August, 2011

On the day following the trouble, both Mark and WV11 were quick to report on the aftermath – both the damage to shops and the efforts to clean up the centre. Mark also made sure people knew about what the police had done to track down the troublemakers.

WV11 posted photographs in the afternoon – showing how people were out on the streets tidying up. They took care, Steph said, to not just capture shops that were damaged, but those that were not. “We took the photos to help to stop the rumours,” Steph said. “That’s one thing about WV11. It’s always been about saying: ‘It’s not all bad, despite what some people think.’”

The ill-founded rumours on Twitter and Facebook continued on the Wednesday, but claims there’d be more trouble never materialised. Mark even cracked a joke about it, as you can see below…

What’s happened since

Both WV11, Mark and others at West Midlands Police continued their work that night and for the next few days. Mark, who has emphasised time and again the really hard work officers on the ground did during the disorder, evidently feels that Twitter had a positive impact as well.

But he points out that it takes time to build your authority in social media – and other constabularies won’t get instant results. “You can’t just pop up from the ground and expect people to trust what you say, because for them there is no point of reference,” he said. “It’s because I’ve used [Twitter] for three or four years and people know who I am and they’ve seen me tweet from policing events before.”

Mark is now followed by more than 7,000 people on Twitter – greater in number than some police forces enjoy. He told me it is a ‘vital tool for modern policing’. “Given the level of interest you try and try to use this well. Wherever I go I find that people love the police. This is an absolutely open goal.”

Update: You can now read Mark’s thoughts about all of this on his blog here.

The WV11 blog has also enjoyed a huge surge in interest as a result of its work during the riots. Steph said: “We want to capitalise on it while we can. Of course we know we can’t hope to sustain the levels we’ve seen but it’s an opportunity to start to engage with more people.” The blog has been talking to the police about a regular blog post from a police officer being published on the site – and Steph and James have already provided a live blog from a PACT meeting.

So what does all this mean?

Steph and James love where they live – that’s why they do what they do. So – quite evidently – does Mark. It’s natural that they should work together, indeed it’s a principle enshrined in the way this country has always been policed. Using social media can evidently help these kinds of relationships to blossom quickly and at times  without any (or very much) formal management. Of course, these same advantages can be used for bad – but the vast majority of people are more like Steph, James and Mark than they are like the looters – as a few minutes spent looking at the WV11 Facebook Page will prove.

Both the guys from WV11 and Mark Payne agree that it’s important for the police and government to make better use of social networking tools. I hope their experiences will convince a few more people to take the plunge.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags:

Social web tools for neighbourhood policing

The Virtual Policing blog

Last week I wrote a post about our Virtual Policing project that we’re involved in with Sussex Police. We had a long and productive meeting with the team members and I’ve already started to sketch out some of the thoughts/experiences that came out of the session – in a post here. I thought, though, that it might be interesting to reflect on some of the more specific stuff that came out of the day – in particular a few of the ideas that we had about how to help people to work with their communities using social media.

As I mentioned before, officers are already using Twitter and Facebook to talk to local people. There are lots of differing experiences – and I think it would be fair to say that the majority of the activity at the moment is about letting people know what the police are up to. The next step for us is to see how the social web can help build relationships.

Several officers have already had good experiences in using Twitter, in particular, to help out individuals with the kinds of information that they can and do already share with the public – for example keeping them informed of traffic issues during major incidents. Obviously, this kind of stuff helps to build up trust and confidence with particular police officers. What follows are ideas that have occurred already as a result of the conversations we have had at the meeting last week – rather than things we’ve tried out. Hopefully some of them will actually be useful!

Boosting meeting attendance

An important tool for a safer neighbourhood team is the meeting. These can, in some instances, be poorly attended – and it would be really great to see how attendance can be increased. While Facebook, Twitter and other social networking tools can be used to promote meetings, might it also be possible to use a tool like Doodle to find a time for a meeting that more people are able/happy to attend?

Image representing Eventbrite as depicted in C...

Image via CrunchBase

Regular meetings could be ‘meetups’ if they’re aimed at a younger audiences – and a tool like Meetup or Eventbrite could be used to organise, communicate about and promote the event.

Sharing information with other agencies – like the council

Neighbourhood police teams can be the frontline for lots of issues that aren’t actually policing. A lot of these are things that need to be passed on to other statutory bodies – in particular local councils. Some of this will be stuff that needs action, but not from the police – like rubbish, vandalism and a host of other issues. ‘Fix My Street‘ allows people to log a problem they’re aware of to a specific place. Councils then have the chance to resolve these issues. It allows the public to track the problem – and see that it’s been dealt with. Police could refer more savvy folk to the tool or even, in some instances, help the public to log problems themselves at meetings.

Telling people where we are (within reason)

As we said above, tools like Twitter and Facebook give police the chance to keep people up to date with what they are doing. But something like FourSquare would allow you to ‘check in’ to certain locations. You could use the data that this creates to report back – offline on the places you’ve visited so that people have a clearer picture of what you’re up to in week. This might not always be practical – and it has to be done sensibly and safely, obviously.

Going beyond the people we can already reach

Obviously, this is what Virtual Policing is about – the desire to form new relationships online with those parts of the population who find it easier (for various reasons) talking through the web than they do face to face. I’m going to dedicate a whole post to this, but the key is obviously finding where these communities collect online – and recognising that people go to different places for different reasons.

Making sure that the online message gets offline, too

An example of a newsletter created from blogs

We might also want to think about ways that online information can easily be brought offline. Adrian Short has designed a tool that allows you to print summaries of blog posts from an RSS feed that might be helpful, for example. It might be possible to bundle up the most important bits of information to share as a PDF newsletter that can be printed. You could even collate local blogs into a newsletter, using a service like Tabbloid that takes RSS feeds and makes them look a bit like a newspaper. This could be shared with those that don’t spend their lives glued to a computer screen!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags:

The Virtual Policing project: Local policing for local people

Yesterday we hosted a catch-up workshop/meeting for the members of the Virtual Policing project, which is looking at how a number of Sussex police officers can use a range of social media to engage with the public. It’s a bit different from the standard ‘tweeting policeman’ model, in that we’re trying to measure the impact that this interaction has – effectively how it changes the relationship the public has with police.

It was, I think, a fantastic day. We didn’t just learn how the officers are beginning to use social media, but what they hope to get out of it, the problems and pressures that arise from its use and the ways that it is changing policing.

In the first part of the day we just chatted about people’s experiences so far. Quite a few things came out:-

  • Different forms of social media work for different people – so some officers prefer Twitter to Facebook and vice versa. It just depends on what kind of work you are looking to do, the people you hope to reach and your own personal views. Twitter was liked by a lot of people because it is easy to use, open and simple. Facebook – with groups, pages and profiles – was complicated and – as one participant put it – ‘clunky’.
  • The speed with which social networking works means that the impact of a message can end up out of proportion with your intentions. Something you hoped would help a few people could be read by thousands – and be picked up by journalists. As a result, what seems an innocent, reasonable remark can have an unintended and disproportionate impact on other people and their work.
  • As a result, real, concrete support from senior officers is vital for those officers who are using social media – and it’s essential to have good guidance on precisely what you can and can’t say.
  • There are opportunities that are emerging to make contact with different people and to change the effectiveness of meetings and other forms of ‘offline engagement’ work. Being imaginative about the tools you use and how you communicate can make a real difference.
  • Real value from social media is about making contact with real people in your area. We’ve learned that it’s relatively easy to get social media types and other police to follow you, but what really makes a difference to neighbourhood policing is the real people that are in your area – local policing for local people, as it were!
  • It’s possible – particularly with Twitter, and with a smart phone – to fit using social media into the small pockets of downtime that the job might naturally provide, so it doesn’t need to be a suck on time.

I think a lot of this makes immediate, obvious common sense but there’s a difference between learning something and hearing it said. What I think was most interesting and exciting about the session was that we started to really develop practical ideas about how this kind of engagement work might help to add value or improve the engagement work that’s already taking place.

As Sergeant Peter Allan (@SgtPeterAllan) pointed out, some of the meetings that neighbourhood policing teams do can be poorly attended. The social media tools we’re exploring offer an opportunity to find ways to talk and share things with the public on their own terms – when and where they want to.

Peter’s point that people may prefer to have their relationship with police online is a really important one – and a primary reason for the growing interest in social media. With that in mind, we spent some time looking at where people are beginning to gather online – from blogs, Facebook, forums and other forms of social networking. The next part of the project is to see how the officers can begin to make contact with these groups so that we can begin to find out more about how these relationships can benefit both the police and the public. Next report soon!

Tags:

Crime mapping and why I will never again go for a big bang launch

Clearly I will be a mass of opinions about the crimemapping data once I can actually get on the site (presently showing no policing in my area but I know this is not true!) but my initial reaction is why oh why did they not launch this more quietly as a beta where we would have all helped them figure out some of the inevitable teething troubles? I know a few folks at the Home Office and I know that their intentions here are really good but what we are seeing is a real clash between the embedded culture and how ‘digitally native’ projects really ought to run.  Is this just entrenched work practices or unrealistic deadlines that meant this was the only way to work?

I’ve been obsessing a bit about this over on curiouscatherine in terms of the need to start thinking about more agile ways of delivering policy – I was part of a session on this at UKGovCamp and you can read the write-up here. A beta release may not have solved all of these load issues (though I would be interested to know what stress testing they did) but it would have meant that there would have been a lot less frustration around the launch and the focus would not have been taken away from the content.

However, this will – I am sure – all sort itself out and we can talk about What It All Means… and embrace the fact that we really can’t start to understand the impacts until we have lived with it for a while. I think we also have to accept that this is the first step in something much larger – and that the next step will need to be shaped by the communities and individuals that we hope will use this data. Those of us who think about open data are very demanding – we want more, wider, deeper data – and that is absolutely right. However we have to get over the idea that this is all being squirreled away and hidden by the State – in some cases it’s not, but in other circumstances we just need to articulate a response that the data holders can actually respond to and that communities will find useful. I think this really means more conversation around the data – and that is what we are suggesting to the Virtual Police research team – we need to take the data as a starting point for a conversation with communities and allow that to shape where we need to dig deeper.

My first thought is that we really need a tool that will allow us to better define ‘an area’ or even ‘a beat’ so that we can query against that rather than post code of mapped name. In fact – I will pitch this at CityCamp Brighton and see if we can get someone to build it. My second thought is that I really want to be able to comment on and correct the data when I see a problem rather than just moan about it. And my last thought is that just making it easier to get at the raw data is something that should have been done in parallel to this – open isn’t just about the data its about the process as well.

However – the big question is what next and I will be watching with a lot of interest.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags:

Very Real Virtual Policing

Over the last couple of months we’ve been working with Sussex Police on a project around Virtual Policing – we’re very excited about how this is going so far.

The idea behind the project is to get some real facts and impact measures around the effects of Neighbourhood Police Officers using social media to interact with their local communities.  There is already a huge amount of anecdotal evidence to show the efficacy of the Police engaging with communities online but we wanted to take this to the next level of evidence and demonstrate the effects in terms of changes to the confidence, trust and information measures that the Police use to gauge the effect of their neighbourhood work.

We have a number of PCSOs, Specials and Officers trained up and in the field now and we are in the process of doing the first round of data collection on the project with the aim of publishing inital results later this month (or early February).  We have set up a separate research blog for the project which you can find here:  Virtual Policing Blog and we will be putting updates and research results here as we go along.

We’re delighted to be working with Sussex Police in order to create what we hope will be a valuable link in the evidence chain around the operational use of Social Media for the Police.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags:

© 2011 Public-i Group Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Blog powered by Wordpress and a Public-i version of the Magatheme theme.